Safety of Extended Interval Dosing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

A Multicenter Cohort Study

Luca Cantini, MD; Francesco Paoloni, MD; Federica Pecci, MD; Francesco Spagnolo, MD, PhD; Carlo Genova, MD; Enrica Teresa Tanda, MD; Sophie Aerts, BSc; Sara Elena Rebuzzi, MD; Giuseppe Fornarini, MD; Federica Zoratto, MD; Sara Fancelli, MD; Alessio Lupi, MD; Carminia Maria Della Corte, MD, PhD; Alessandro Parisi, MD; Chiara Bennati, MD; Cinzia Ortega, MD; Francesco Atzori, MD; Pier Luigi Piovano, MD; Corrado Orciuolo, MD; Michele De Tursi, MD; Michele Ghidini, MD, PhD; Andrea Botticelli, MD, PhD; Simone Scagnoli, MD; Lorenzo Belluomini, MD; Rita Leporati, MD; Antonello Veccia, MD; Anna Maria Di Giacomo, MD; Lucia Festino, MD; Diego Cortinovis, MD; Mirko Acquati, MD; Marco Filetti, MD; Raffaele Giusti, MD; Marco Tucci, MD; Maria Chiara Sergi, MD; Mattia Garutti, MD; Fabio Puglisi, MD; Sara Manglaviti, MD; Fabrizio Citarella, MD; Matteo Santoni, MD, PhD; Erika Rijavec, MD; Giuseppe Lo Russo, MD, PhD; Daniele Santini, MD; Alfredo Addeo, MD; Lorenzo Antonuzzo, MD, PhD; Alice Indini, MD; Marco Bruno Luigi Rocchi, MSc; Alessio Cortellini, MD, PhD; Francesco Grossi, MD; Paolo Antonio Ascierto, MD; Joachim G. J. V. Aerts, MD, PhD; Rossana Berardi, MD

Disclosures

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023;115(7):796-804. 

In This Article

Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

Background: Real-life spectrum and survival implications of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with extended interval dosing (ED) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are unknown.

Methods: Characteristics of 812 consecutive solid cancer patients who received at least 1 cycle of ED monotherapy (pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W or nivolumab 480 mg Q4W) after switching from canonical interval dosing (CD; pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or nivolumab 240 mg Q2W) or treated upfront with ED were retrieved. The primary objective was to compare irAEs patterns within the same population (before and after switch to ED). irAEs spectrum in patients treated upfront with ED and association between irAEs and overall survival were also described.

Results: A total of 550 (68%) patients started ICIs with CD and switched to ED. During CD, 225 (41%) patients developed any grade and 17 (3%) G3 or G4 irAEs; after switching to ED, any grade and G3 or G4 irAEs were experienced by 155 (36%) and 20 (5%) patients. Switching to ED was associated with a lower probability of any grade irAEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 0.99; P = .047), whereas no difference for G3 or G4 events was noted (aOR = 1.55, 95% CI = 0.81 to 2.94; P = .18). Among patients who started upfront with ED (n = 232, 32%), 107 (41%) developed any grade and 14 (5%) G3 or G4 irAEs during ED. Patients with irAEs during ED had improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.82; P = .004 after switching; aHR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.93; P = .025 upfront).

Conclusions: Switching ICI treatment from CD and ED did not increase the incidence of irAEs and represents a safe option also outside clinical trials.

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have deeply changed clinical practice in the field of medical oncology. Despite their first introduction as traditional body weight–based dosing regimens, simulation pharmacokinetics studies demonstrated that weight provides only a marginal contribution to ICIs physiological distribution; therefore ICI flat doses became the standard.[1–3]

Recently, long life expectancy of patients treated with ICIs, high health-care costs, and the need to reduce avoidable hospital admissions during COVID-19 crises led to an increasing interest in alternative longer dosing schedules. According to clinical trials data, adoption of extended interval dosing (ED) ICIs (pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W and nivolumab 480 mg Q4W) offers similar outcomes and safety compared with canonical interval dosing (CD) schedules (200 mg Q3W and 240 mg Q2W, respectively).[4–7] This makes the pair with economic and logistic advantages provided by ED ICIs, which seem to be unquestionable. Although in the real-life setting, an increasingly wide percentage of patients has been shifted to (or treated upfront with) ED ICIs, incidence, clinical patterns, and survival implications for patients who develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during ED ICIs are unknown. In a recent study involving 45 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the switching of pembrolizumab from CD to ED resulted in the manifestation of different and worsening irAEs.[8] In this multicenter cohort study, we aim to provide further insights on this topic by 1) investigating the safety of switching the ICI interval dosing from CD to ED across multiple cancer types and different indications, 2) characterizing the spectrum of irAEs in cancer patients treated upfront with ED ICIs, and[3] describing the association between irAEs and overall survival (OS) in ED-treated patients.

processing....