One has to be living off the grid to not be bombarded with direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmaceutical advertising. Since 1997, when the US Food and Drug Administration eased restrictions on this prohibition and allowed pharmaceutical companies to promote prescription-only medications to the public, there has been a deluge of ads in magazines, on the internet, and, most annoying, on commercial television.
These television ads are quite formulaic:
We are initially introduced to a number of highly functioning patients (typically actors) who are engaged in rewarding pursuits. A voiceover narration then presents the pharmaceutical to be promoted, suggesting (not so subtly) to consumers that taking the advertised drug will improve one's disease outlook or quality of life such that they too, just like the actors in the minidrama, can lead such highly productive lives.
The potential best-case scenarios of these new treatments may be stated. There then follows a litany of side effects — some of them life threatening— warnings, and contraindications. We're again treated to another 5 or 10 seconds of patients leading "the good life," and almost all of the ads end with the narrator concluding: "Ask your doctor (sometimes 'provider') if _____ is right for you."
Big pharma spends nearly $10 billion on DTC advertising, with television ads accounting for the vast majority of these dollars. Is this type of advertising appropriate? Or even ethical?
Americans spend more money on their prescriptions than do citizens of any other highly developed nation. I have personally heard from patients who get their prescriptions from other countries, where they are more affordable. These patients will also cut their pills in half or take a medication every other day instead of every day, to economize on drug costs.
Another "trick" they use to save money — and I have heard pharmacists and pharmaceutical reps themselves recommend this — is to ask for a higher dose of a medication, usually double, and then use a pill cutter to divide a tablet in half, thus making their prescription last twice as long. Why do Americans have to resort to such "workarounds"?
Many of the medications advertised are for relatively rare conditions, such as thyroid eye disease or myasthenia gravis (which affects up to about 60,000 patients in the United States). Why not spend these advertising dollars on programs to make drugs taken by the millions of Americans with common conditions (eg, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure) more affordable?
Very often the television ads contain medical jargon, such as: "If you have the EGFR mutation, or if your cancer is HER2 negative..."
Do most patients truly understand what these terms mean? And what happens when a patient's physician doesn't prescribe a medication that a patient has seen on TV and asks for, or when the physician believes that a generic (nonadvertised) medication might work just as well? This creates conflict and potential discord, adversely affecting the doctor-patient relationship.
An oncologist colleague related to me that he often has to spend time correcting patients' misperceptions of potential miracle cures offered by these ads, and that several patients have left his practice because he would not prescribe a drug they saw advertised.
Further, while these ads urge patients to try expensive "newest and latest" treatments, pharmacy benefits plans are working with healthcare insurance conglomerates to reduce costs of pharmaceuticals.
How does this juxtaposition of opposing forces make any sense?
It is time for us to put an end to DTC advertising, at least on television. It will require legislative action by our federal government to end this practice (legal, by the way, only in the United States and New Zealand), and hence the willingness of our politicians to get behind legislation to do so.
Just as a law was passed to prohibit tobacco advertising on television, so should a law be passed to regulate DTC pharmaceutical advertising.
The time to end DTC advertising has come!
Follow Medscape on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube
Credits:
Lead image: Lloyd Alterman, MD
Image 1: Lloyd Alterman, MD
Medscape Business of Medicine © 2023 WebMD, LLC
Any views expressed above are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WebMD or Medscape.
Cite this: Time to End Direct-to-Consumer Ads, Says Physician - Medscape - Jul 25, 2023.
Comments